• Transforming leadership
    • Accountability and responsiveness
    • Features of an enabling environment
    • Leadership and capacity
  • Transforming sectors
    • Agriculture and food security
    • Social protection
    • Women’s empowerment
  • Transforming delivery

Transform Nutrition

  • Home
  • About
    • Purpose
    • People
      • Our management team
      • Our steering group
      • Our advisory group
      • Our communications working group
    • Partners
      • Consortium Partners
      • Project partners
    • Capacity strengthening
    • Research uptake
    • Contact us
  • What we do
    • Nutrition Champions
    • Stories of Change
    • Short courses
    • Seminar series
    • Together for Nutrition
    • Transform Nutrition Leaders Network
    • India Health Report on Nutrition 2015
  • Publications
  • Country focus
    • Bangladesh
    • Ethiopia
    • India
    • Kenya
  • News
    • Blog
    • Newsletter
Home » Stories of change » Back to the storyboard
Stories of change logo

Back to the storyboard

May 23, 2017 - 1 Comment

Martin Kharumwa / Save the Children
© Martin Kharumwa / Save the Children

by Stuart Gillespie

What knowledge is needed to ride a bike? Is it enough to have a manual?  Of course not… you need to get on the bike, fall off, get back on again… and eventually you’ll figure it out. The manual may provide information on “what” to do, but knowledge of “how” to do it is tacit knowledge that can only be acquired from experience.  This important distinction was made in “The Concept of Mind” (1949) by Gilbert Ryle, a British philosopher – between “knowing that” and “knowing how”. In nutrition, as in many development arenas, we have a wealth of knowledge products (guidelines, toolkits, checklists) that focus on “what to do” but not enough documented experience of attempts (some successful) of how to do it.

In his recent book, “How Change Happens” Duncan Green uses the analogy of raising a child.  What would a child turn out like if parents developed a logframe for child-rearing and slavishly followed it? And would they still be speaking, 20 years later? In the real world, parents make it up as they go along — they rely on experience and advice from other parents who have been there.  “Learning by doing” is important for all of us sometimes succeeding, sometimes failing. But learning from someone else’s “doing” is also possible, so long as it’s documented and conveyed – ideally in a compelling narrative or story, so that it is more easily retrieved.

Addressing the challenge of multisectoral issues like malnutrition involves actions that occur within a complex system, and in which knowledge comes from both evidence (e.g. from published studies) and crucially, from experience.

This was the essential rationale for the Stories of Change (SoC) initiative, developed by Transform Nutrition. To meet the growing demand from many countries for experiential learning, SoC sought to systematically assess and analyse drivers of change in six high-burden countries (Bangladesh, India (Odisha), Ethiopia, Nepal, Senegal, and Zambia) that have had some success in accelerating improvements in nutrition.

All countries undertook analysis of changes over several decades in nutrition outcomes, changes in nutrition-specific and nutrition-sensitive drivers, and changes in nutrition-relevant policies and programs. Semi-structured key informant interviews – 434 in all – were carried out with a range of stakeholders at different levels, along with 14 focus group discussions. We set out to tell structured stories of what happened, drawing upon the experiences and memories of a range of key actors who were there – including policymakers, district government officials, NGO reps, private sector employees, frontline workers and women in high-burden communities.

These stories are brought together in a special issue of Global Food Security this month, comprising 10 papers – six national case studies along with papers dedicated to analyzing quantitative drivers of change, perceptions of change at the community level, a set of 10 commentaries from global and national champions, and an overarching synthesis paper.

Key ingredients of positive change that we see repeated in different contexts are commitment, coherence, accountability, data, leadership, capacity and finance.  These all need to be present over time, for progress to be made and for it to be sustained – but they will not look the same in every place. The choice of actual policy and program actions (the “what”) will necessarily be driven by context — including the type of problems being faced, available solutions, and the capacity to act – these interlinked factors are the fundamental building blocks that determine how change happens, and can be (proactively) made to happen.

Change and challenge are almost the same words – and we see that many changes were triggered by the need to respond to a challenge and, turning it round, changes also generate challenges.  Like “crisis and opportunity”, they are flip sides of the same coin.  SoC interviewees discussed both – shining a light on how windows of opportunity may open up (e.g. political change) to address longstanding challenges and generate positive changeand how, as progress is made, new challenges come to the forefront.  Many countries, for example, have made major gains in aligning policies and generating cross-sectoral consensus and coherence on nutrition.  The new challenge is vertical coherence – that is, how to make this work in practice, from national through district to community levels.

Books about stories are proliferating! In the brilliantly titled “Houston, We Have a Narrative”, Randy Olson suggests that the single biggest problem facing science today is “narrative deficiency”. And in “The Myth Gap: what happens when evidence and argument aren’t enough?”, Alex Evans also makes the case for better stories – in his case to get the climate change message across. We’re in the same position with nutrition.  Data and evidence are key, but not enough. We need stories of change that resonate and can themselves catalyse change — all the more important in the context of the multiple burdens of malnutrition we’re now facing.  We need to build a library of experience, well curated and accessible – and we need to become better storytellers.

Trackbacks

  1. Stories of Change Featured in Special Issue of Global Food Security says:
    May 25, 2017 at 4:33 pm

    […] individual and institutional commitment, accountability, and human capacity.  As discussed in a new blog post by Stuart Gillespie, co-editor of Nourishing Millions, many countries have succeeded in aligning […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Explore Countries

Explore outputs

Book chapter
Digital/photo story
Event
Journal article
Research brief
Working paper
Stories of Change logo

Tweets about #nutritionstories

Partners

ICDDRC logo IFPRI logo IDS logo PHFI logo SC Logo

Sign up for the Transform Nutrition newsletter

* indicates required

Transform Nutrition on Twitter

Tweets by @TN_NutritionRPC

Transform Nutrition is a consortium of five international research and development partners funded by the UK Department for International Development. Using research-based evidence we aim to inspire effective action to address undernutrition.
Transform Nutrition is supported by the UK Department for International Development
© 2021 · Transform Nutrition consortium partners | Terms and Conditions | Contact us